Reading through the Declaration of
Human and Civic Rights, I found myself often drawing back to Rousseau. For
example, the first article states that men are free and equal and social
distinctions may be based only on the common good – though Rousseau in this
case would find this impossible, as inequality is inherent in the social
contract of civil society; rather than assuring equality, it instead solidifies
inequalities. Article 4, too, reminded me of Rousseau, in that it states that
every citizen is obliged – one of
Rousseau’s main arguments that entry into civil society assures inequality: the
poor are obliged to protect the
property of the wealthy.
In solidifying these inequalities
among men (with social contract), we seem to doom ourselves – at least so it
seems from Rousseau’s work. While we may enter society to escape the state of
war, our social contract itself, wrought with agreed-upon inequality, maintains
the roots of the state of war.
Looking at society in this way, it seems that Rousseau foresees a cycle of
war-society-war and so on. Does Rousseau see the human population as doomed?
Would he believe that eventually man would destroy himself, through the cycle of
destruction and corruption of society and the subsequent rise of the state of
war?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.